Hadrian said 06/06, 01:55 AM
Human pair-bonding License? No way!
Dick-dick? ****-****? No license for loving. Dick-****? Love away people!
In the defense of "traditional" marriage, many states deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples. However, marriage licenses are available for most man-woman couples.
But wait! Same-sex couples are constitutionally entitled to all the rights and benefits of marriage. In some states, same-sex couples can get a license -- but bearing a different designation. Same-sex couples have to settle for "domestic partnerships". "Marriage" is reserved for opposite-sex couples.
If we have to have a political war over the marriage word, lets fight all the fights. Let's have differently designated licenses for hetero-couples looking to enjoy the benefits of traditional marriage but not quite up to the requirements.
Not a Virgin? Getting remarried? You get a differently designated license. Married but with a propensity to cheat? In a rocky marriage that is likely to end? You get points taken off your license as would a driver for driving drunk or speeding. After enough penalty points, your partnership is given a "Never Should Have Married License".
Marrying but infertile? Hmmmm...
TheChocolateBearFactory said 06/06, 08:10 AM
For Christ's sake, Hadrian, are you just baked all the time?
Seriously, where dou you get your herb?
I could hook you up with my friend in CO, his grass is kickin.
Anyway, if you think gay marriages should be able to get licenses, wouldn't you say we should simplify the marriage process?
I honestly think you're on uppers or something.
Hadrian said 06/06, 09:52 AM
How interesting it is to hear of your connection to the illegal narcotics trade. Are offers to hook me up with your pals in the white slavery trade soon to follow?
Why, yes, "if you think gay marriages should be able to get licenses, wouldn't you say we should simplify the marriage process?" Yes indeed. If you are gonig to debate, wouldn't you say you pay attention to my argument?
As I said, If we HAVE to have a political war over the marriage word, lets fight all the fights. If we don't have to have this political war over the marriage word, then, yes, life will be a lot simpler.
I honestly think you aren't really paying attention.
TheChocolateBearFactory said 06/17, 06:52 PM
I meant we shouldn't get a bunch of different marriage licenses because that would complicate the marriage process for everyone.
BTW As an angry black man, I would fully support a white slave trade.
I think you guys should shine the rims on our cars and work in our Marijuana plantations.
I was just kidding about the white slave trade thing.
Hadrian said 06/18, 05:25 AM
I agree, we shouldn't HAVE TO get a bunch of different marriage licenses - not even ones disguised by calling it a ""domestic partnership".
But if we have to complicate life for same-sex couples, then lets complicate the marriage process for everyone!
TheChocolateBearFactory said 06/19, 07:33 PM
I think we should just make it easy for everyone to get married, with the exception of cross-species relationships.
Do I come across as abraisive to you guys? Because I am a chronic nice person and I am trying to change that.
TheChocolateBearFactory | 06/17/08
Report Offensive CommentNo you don't come across as abrasive, however, like me, you are probably annoyed at having someone (Hadrian) represent a viewpoint you support so poorly.
Rotovia PhD | 06/19/08
Report Offensive CommentPlease keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.
This year, close to 90 ships have been seized in and around the Gulf of Aden, more than triple the number of 2007
(Jason R. Zalasky / US Navy / EPA )
I kinda beat you to the punch on this topic, Hadrian (see debate 10821), but as always, you did it with more punch. Kudos!
DonkeyDude | 06/09/08
Report Offensive Comment