Obama-button
Face Offs: 2
Wins: 0
Losses: 2
Ties: 0
Charleston, SC
All Face Offs
10
Vote
Gravel-button
Face Offs: 7
Wins: 1
Losses: 6
Ties: 0
No City, XX
All Face Offs
4
Vote

Barack Obama's lack of "experience" does not hurt his ability to be president.


Leadership is a composite of many different qualities. while expierience ranks high among these, charecteristics like honor, judgement, and trustworthiness also form the backbone of leadership. the Clintonian definintion of "expierience" equates it with "ability", but this is simply not the case. This nation's expierience with the Clinton's indicates that although they are astute and succesful politicians, with decades of expierience under their collective belt, they lack some of the other qualities essential to leadership.


Experience is very important. John F. Kennedy had little experience (yet more experience than Obama does, Kennedy was in the Congress and Senate), and he almost got America into World War III, and had the terrible Bay of Pigs blunder, and caused for Russia to be just a little more dominant. I would rather Obama than Clinton, but experience is necessary for leadership. One can inspire, but that doesn't necessartily mean one could lead and implement their plans. One must have the "know-how" to get things done, and Obama has too little experience to do that. He will realize that not all of politics is local, and he will have a hard time making friends with people, especially since he's been voted the most liberal senator. Clinton had a good two terms as president (but Bush Sr. was a good president oo, in my opinion), there was peace and prosperity. Will Hillary be a good president? Probably not. But nor will Obama.


Of course the entire premise that Obama lacks expierience depends on your definition of the term. Although Barack Obama has spent a relativeley short time in the Federal Government and has not held an executive power position, he served a long and distinguished term in his state legislature and in the US Senate he has voted liberal, but as we can see from his consitent position on the war in Iraq, this is not neccesarily a bad thing. Furthermore, it was not Kennedy's expierience that saw us through the Cuban misle crises, it was his judgement and the wisdom of the advisers he chose to inform his decisions. and the work kennedy did for the civil rights movement and for geting us to the moon, these acts weren't motivated by his own interest or first-hand expiereince with them but by his understanding of their meaning outside of himself. these were the qualities of a leader. it was not what JFK or RFK did that got them killed as much as what they believed and what they inspired the rest of us to do. the president's job is not to have his or her finger in every by and to be fully versed in every facet of everything. the presidents job is to compile information, and make a wise decision


You make some very interesting and worthwhile points, but I feel I must refute them. First you say, "Although Barack Obama has spent a relativeley short time in the Federal Government and has not held an executive power position, he served a long and distinguished term in his state legislature". Local politics are COMPLETELY different than national politics, and being in the state legislator is kind of a nothing job. It's your entry level job into the foray of politics. Kennedy was a state senator, a U.S. senator, and a congressman before he (in my opinion) served a presidency with many blunders a few victories. Next you say, "Furthermore, it was not Kennedy's expierience that saw us through the Cuban misle crises, it was his judgement and the wisdom of the advisers he chose to inform his decisions." Kennedy got us into the situation in the first place, because he authorized the missiles to be aimed at Russia. It was the great Dwight Eisenhower (who had a TON of experience)who advised Kennedy on how to handle the predicament. The presidents job is to know what they're doing.


In his book "Hardball", Political commentator Chris Matthews writes a chapter on one of his political laws, "All politics is local." There is a reason we look for expierience in our candidates, because as you point out they should "know what they're doing", and the clearest manifestation of that is addressed in another of the books chapters titled "What have ya fone for me lately. granted there is a diference between local and national politics, but a strong grounding in what individual americans are like--their wants, need, fears and hopes--can only help a president. now, on the issue of the cuban missle crisis, i had the oppurtunity to attend a speech by Ted Sorenson, a speechwriter and adviser to the president who was president during that pivotal time. His comments indicated that President Kennedy authorized the military readiness only as a precaution at the advice of the joint cheifs of staff, however, when they recommended a pre-emptive strike to disable the WMD (sound familiar?) it was president Kennedy's stength of character and his wisdom in trusting advisers like Mr. Sorenson that led him to do the opposite of our current commander in chief and refuse to launch a strike.

10 months remaining for the next argument...

Comments

Add Your Comment
Obama-button

In his book "Hardball", Political commentator Chris Matthews writes a chapter on one of his political laws, "All politics is local." There is a reason we look for expierience in our candidates, because as you point out they should "know what they're doing", and the clearest manifestation of that is addressed in another of the books chapters titled "What have ya fone for me lately. granted there is a diference between local and national politics, but a strong grounding in what individual americans are like--their wants, need, fears and hopes--can only help a president. now, on the issue of the cuban missle crisis, i had the oppurtunity to attend a speech by Ted Sorenson, a speechwriter and adviser to the president who was president during that pivotal time. His comments indicated that President Kennedy authorized the military readiness only as a precaution at the advice of the joint cheifs of staff, however, when they recommended a pre-emptive strike to disable the WMD (sound familiar?) it was president Kennedy's stength of character and his wisdom in trusting advisers like Mr. Sorenson that led him to do the opposite of our current commander in chief and refuse to launch a strike, quite possibly avoiding armageddon. now i ask you sir, no man or woman who will enter the oval office in 2009 as ever had the expierience of having their finger on the nuclear trigger. I ask you then, what is the most important quality that hand's bearer should have?

Report Offensive Comment
Clinton

I would have to agree that his "lack of experience" does not make him a bad choice. Look at what we have now. George W. Bush lacks in a great deal of categories. The economy his headed toward recession, the war is still not over (even after a second term), his popularity is so low that even his vice president didnt run for election, the US was attacked on his watch...need I go on? How about him turning his back on the UN? Now the next president has to repair that. I say give Obama a chance! At least he gives better speeches than W.

Report Offensive Comment
Whitehouse

Ikefan, you say that local politics are different than national politics. But I believe Reagan was an actor most of his life before becoming a governor. Now the republicans have made an icon of this man with little national political experience. Looks like Obama, could at least do as well as Reagan did.

Report Offensive Comment

Post A Comment

Please keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


or cancel

TIME PHOTO ESSAYS

Heartbreak in the Middle East

As the conflict unfolds in the Gaza Strip, the pain of loss is felt on both sides

( )


A Photo Album of Presidents and Their Children

As Malia and Sasha Obama arrive in Washington, they join a rarefied group of war heroes, authors, socialites and enfants terribles

(AP )