Ariyel won the Face Off.
Obama
Face Offs: 2
Wins: 0
Losses: 2
Ties: 0
No City, XX
All Face Offs
4
Votes
Elephant3
Face Offs: 7
Wins: 4
Losses: 3
Ties: 0
Bellevue, NE
All Face Offs
7
Votes

Reverend Wrights Statements? Are they really horrible are they really wrong? Are they the truth?


An uproar has recently been made over the comments of Barack Obama's pastor. Many people are saying these comments were out of line, unpatriotic and horrible. But haven't addressed specifically what they find terrible. A number of Wright's preachings were shown. In one sermon he had talked about blacks and oppression. He explained that Obama did not fit intothe mold. And that Hilary Clinton does indeed fit into. The mold. He also stated that the United States is controlled by rich white people. Is this really a lie? All of the media circuits are owned by eight families, that happen to be white. Today, in a world were many do not think for themselves, they rely on the media to develop their opinion on current events. The GOP is currently in control of the control, and of course it is white. To be honest, all of the comments that Wright made were not new, they were not outrageous, but they were the truth. White America does not have much of a problem with Wrights comments, but the idea that Obama just may be pro-black is what bothers them. I believe White America is more comfortable seeing Barack Obam as as a biracial man..


Where angels fear to tread.

Jeremiah Wrights statements are wrong. Aside from horrible timing, and complete obliviousness as to how his statment would affect Obama's campaign, Reverend Wright is quite paranoid.

Aside from the ridiculous charges of inventing HIV for genocide and government supplied drugs for population control, his paranoia continues to extend to racism in the US. Now, I do not deny that the whites hold the majority of powerful positions and that racism does exist, but the idea that he is trying to state that Barack Obama, a successful lawyer, married to a successful lawyer, turned US Senator with a successful presidential campaign has somehow been restrained by racism is blindingly silly.

America has significantly progressed in racial equality; the barriers have been removed. It is now up to the black community to take charge and run with the opportunities; and they have! Blacks are now represented in the highest levels of corportate, military and government authority and influence.

America is not concerned with a black Barack Obama; do not forget the calls for Colin Powell and Condolezza Rice to run for President - from the "white" GOP.


The Grand Old Party doesn't want Rice and Powell to be president. Rice and Powell would attract black voters, which is what a candidate would need to win. If McCain were to run with Powell as VP, and Clinton were to be the democratic choice, honestly, lots of blacks are going to stay home or vote for McCain+ Powell. The reason Rice was called upon, was because she is a doer, not a thinker. In this, I am not saying she is naive, I'm sure she is brilliant. I heard she graduated highschool early. What I mean is that unlike Powell, she did not leave when the administration started to crumble and turned even more conservative. The barriers have certainly not be removed for Blacks. It is completely ignorant for you to say that. Do you know how many people have admitted in exit polls that they did not vote for Obama because of his race. In the beggining people were questioning if he was black enough to win the black vote. Ironic, Ferraro's words, "Obama is only getting attention because he is black." People were saying that this comment, was out of line, but now a black minister, Obama's minister says that blacks have been oppressed, and he is the most unpatriotic racist alive.


You lost me on the first half of your argument; what exactly are you trying to say?

If there were still barriers in place, the nomination would already have gone to Hillary and Obama would have faded into obscurity a long time ago. Exit poll results vary widely from state to state, so they are hardly a reliable reference. Blacks only comprise about 13% of the US population according to the 2005 census, so he is not riding on the black vote; how has he been so successful if Wright is correct? As I stated earlier, we have black Fortune-500 CEOs, Senators, Congressman, military leaders, Government leaders, doctors, lawyers, etc. Where are the barriers that held down Rice, Powell, Paterson, Obama, Parsons, and the other successful black Americans?

The media likes to play on race because gossip sells. They will focus completely on the racists and ignore the 90% who are not. Politicians like to sling mud and make insinuations because they want to get elected. It is obviously not working.

Ferraro was forced to resign for her comments and it is a stretch to claim that Wright simply stated blacks have been oppressed (US deserved 9/11, created HIV for genocide, and God-damn the US?)


The comments that the United States deserved 9/11 and that it created HIV for genocide is not new. Many people of different backgrounds hold this belief. The idea the gov't created HIV is very prominent in the black community because of racial tensions. You have to consider the atmosphere in Chicago. Dr. King said Chicago had some of the meanest whites, and was one of the most segregated cities, far more segregated than any city he had seen in the south. You also have to consider that Martin Luther King jr.'s time, many civil rights or political affairs were organized within church. This is very true in present times. You said that blacks have no barriers, if they did some of them would not be able to obtain some powerful positions. That is completely ignorant. You have no idea of what these blacks went through to come to where they are today. Just because they are sucesses today, doesn't mean the path there was clear for them. I am very sure that these sucessful black people were subject to numerous racial barriers, and they surpassed them all to achieve sucess. Back to Reverend Wright, how exactly were any of his comments racist.


The entire first half of your argument is irrelevent. How Reverend Wright FEELS about the past and present times in Chicago does not validate his arguments as truth. In fact, that kind of bitterness and paranoia skews ones perceptions. We are not living in Dr. King's times. Because Reverend Wright is angry, it does not make his comments right.

Slavery and segregation in the United States was horrible; many people worked and shed blood to help us overcome that ignorance. Today, all the opportunities that are afforded whites are afforded blacks and many programs have been put in place to balance what disadvantages are left over from segregation era. Today, even the vaguest insinuation of racism is carefully combed over and the suspect burned on the news. Wright's arguments are a rehash of the same old "Whites are successful because they are privileged; blacks fail because they are oppressed by whites." Many black leaders are now standing up and saying enough is enough; stop blaming white people for failure.

You have twice called me ignorant. I have offered names, examples and statistics to back up my argument. Your entire argument is based on speculation and emotional appeal.

Comments

Add Your Comment
Limbaugh

But the fact that our country is controlled by eight families doesn't make you suspicious. What does democracy mean? What does race mean if you are wealthy and successful? If the media and the government stopped making race a big issue it wouldn't be an issue. If someone says the racial slur for an African American let him get beat up, then he'll learn. Post civil war the president has become a puppet for those who are really in power. Look at Grant through George W. Bush. If the founding fathers were alive today they would be calling for a war on the massive federal government who abused their power for ulterior motives. Learn from the past instead of forgetting it.

Report Offensive Comment
Elephant3

Where is this eight family thing coming from? The media is primarily owned by six corporations, three of which are public: CBS, Time-Warner, GE, Disney, News Corp. and Viacom. CBS and Viacom are owned by Sumner Redstone (Republican), Time-Warner is public (CEO Jeff Bewkes is Democrat), GE is public (CEO Jeff Immelt tries to remain politically neutral), Disney is public (CEO Rupert Iger is Democrat), and News Corp. is owned by Rupert Murdoch (Republican). The media likes to play with race because it's gossip and gossip sells and the media usually tilts left anyways (http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Media-Bias-Is-Real-Finds-UCLA-6664.aspx?RelNum=6664). If America was really as evil and racist as Wright insinuates, Obama would have vanished into obscurity long ago.

Report Offensive Comment
Obama

Ariyel? You there have a rebuttle or stumped? You can forfeit...you know I am right.

Report Offensive Comment
Elephant3

Sorry Crimo, not done yet.

Report Offensive Comment
Obama

There were a few more things I wanted mention about racial barriers. Barack Obama cannot say everything Hilary Clinton can say, if he wants to maintain his campaign. What I mean is that he cannot mention to much about civil rights specifically for blacks, if he doesn't want to be considered the next Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson. He cannot ome across as pro-black, or he will indeed lose much of his white vote and deter possible white and probably hispanic and asian voters. Do you remember that debate that aired on CNN and telemundo? The candidates were asked if they believed that Blacks were losing their jobs to hispanic illegal and legal immigrants. He of course couldn't agree, and insist that blacks couldn't blame unemployment on immigrants. Of course shrewd and frigid, Hilary Clinton took that chance to reel in ignorant Black voters and admitted that Blacks were losing employment to hispanics.

Report Offensive Comment
Clinton-button

If Hillary even mentions the word black to describe her coffee someone is standing in the wings to call her a racist. There are plenty of things she is not allowed to say. Jesse Jackson while working for the Obama campaign even called her a racist for crying in public. There are barriers in place. At the moment they actually support Obamas nomination. It shows in his taking 92% of the black vote in the last primary. You mentioned the statements about HIV being old beliefs. That does not make them correct. So, you are already using an example of Reverent Wright being completely wrong. Saying America deserved to be attacked is wrong on so many levels as well as unpatriotic. You can disagree with policy, but to say we deserve to have thousands die in a terrorist attack is just plain evil. I would say the same for Pat Roberts comments on Katrina as well as other far right religious leaders comments of a similar nature.

Report Offensive Comment
Obama

Your comments about Clinton subject to racism aren't true. Jesse Jackson did not call her crying racist? What are you talking about? Did that air on Fox News or something?

Report Offensive Comment
Obama

I do not agree with Rev. Wright's comments about America being deserved to be attacked by terroists. But as I mentioned at the same time you have to consider his background. He was born in an era of un-subtle racism, hatred and segregation. He is a product of his environment. But then you have to consider, did America deserve this? In no way am I defending the taking of thousands of lives in the attack, but look at America's history and present. I have heard many people of all races(especially whites), say how much they hate America. These people fail to realize with all the atrocities of America, we live like no one else, we have access to things people of other countries have little access to. We have a superior position in the world, the president of the United States is dubbed to have the most important job in the world. When misfortune come to other countries, America is almost called upon to help. As much as you may like to believe different, America is a greedy consumer nation. In times of apartheid, the US goverment was nothing but a bystander, and with the conflict in Sudan, in present times, the government still remains a bystander. And the reason for this is that America does not want to ruin relations with the Arabs of Darfur, they do not want to lose oil.

Report Offensive Comment
Elephant3

Here is an article concerning the "barriers" in place for black america. http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_1_whats_holding_blacks.html

Report Offensive Comment
Elephant

Is this a fight for racial equality? FIrst off, let me tell Crimo that barriers have been removed for blacks. Let me put it this way, you argue that white people say they won't for Obama because he is black. How is this diffrent than black people saying they won't vote for McCain or CLinton because there white? Let's face it, race is an issue and racism works both ways. TO think that Obama has in anyway been oppressed is seriously mistaken. He is the rags to riches story! How is that being oppressed? Your argument makes no sence. Blacks have more rights in this country than whites. You argue for equality, but what you really want is blacks to be in power. Prime example is in the OJ Simpson case. OJ Simpson got away with murder because one of the white witnesses said that "(n word)killed her." Should he have said this? Probably not. Does that make OJ any more or less guilty of murdering his wife? Absolutely not! The man commited the crime and got away with it because he screamed racism! I'm black, it's not my fault. It's the white people's fault that oppressed me over 50 years ago. If you are not over the age of 60 and a black citizen than you have no right to cry any type of racism! Secondly, the media might be owned by so called white families, but those white families sure do give Obama a lot of support. THey sure do seem to put his face in every news broadcast and on the front page of every newspaper. It seems to me like Obama has the monopoly on the press. So I dont understand your argument against the WHITE PRESS!

Report Offensive Comment
Brown

I would have to disagree on several points, Mr Shrek. There are still barriers in place in modern society, but they are social as opposed to legal. It's more a rich/poor divide in modern society rather than black/white, but as a result of the segregation of the recent past the black community (and others) are just more likely to be in the poor category. Social mobility isn't particularly easy - if you come from a poor neighbourhood and attend a poor school you are simply less likely to succeed (at least in terms of getting a well paid job and so on). On the OJ Simpson case, while the race card was certainly played in order to aquit him he was only able to play it because some of the officers investigating him were either racist or highly incompetant - they botched the investigation and are to blame for the collapse of their case against him.

Report Offensive Comment
Elephant

I agree that there is a divide and rich are on one side and poor are on the other. I also agree that black's are primarily on the poorer divide. However, I do not believe this is all to do with segregation. A black student is 3 times more likely to drop out of high school in a rural area than is a white student. IN a city a black student is 5 times more likely to drop out of high school than is a white student. Why is this? Most of the people that go to inner city schools are poorer kids. Why is it that black students are 5 times more likely to drop out when having similar finacial capabilities? Regardless of what the answer to these two questions are the fact still remains the same that traditionally black people force themselves to stay in the same rute they lived in all their lives because it is the easy road out. That's not what America is about, it's not about easy street. It's about work for what you want and let no one stop you. I applied for college late, in High School I had a 3.2GPA. Because I applied so late I got put on a waiting list for the school I wanted to attend. I found out later that I was put on a waiting list primarily because the college needed to accept more black students because they did not meet their quota for federal aide. I did some personal checking and these men and women that got in ahead of me had a standard average of 2.5! How is this fair? It's not! That is why I say that blacks have equal, I would argue more, rights than whites do in this country.

Report Offensive Comment
Romney

Crimo has a good point. The rich whites do seem to run the country. I believe that its time for the nation to put racism behind us. We need to move on. One of the positive things that Obama brings to the table is that he is the only cannidate that can bridge the racial divide. Wright's comments only fuel racism. So I believe that they are wrong. Obama even made a speach and said himself that they are wrong.

Report Offensive Comment
Romney

I agree with shreks last comment. The women want total equality too and there is nothing wrong with that. I support complete and total equality. This means that women should have to fill out draft cards when they turn 18 just like the men do. I also believe that if women want to serve in the infantry than they should have to meet the same physical standards that men do. Some women would argue that its not fair because very few women can meet the same standards as men. I think that having a women serve in the same platoon as men is unfair to the men because what if someone is wounded and the women has to pick them up and cary them. That women cant and its not fair to the man who must lay there and die.

Report Offensive Comment
Romney

Did anyone hear the speach that Clinton made on MLK day. She was at a black church and she mentioned how congress is run like a plantation and she heard crickets. What was she thinking? LOL

Report Offensive Comment
Flagabstract

crimo, try to make your arguments less based on your opponents ignorance, that only causes people to want to vote against you. Ariyel, your arguments were shift to the point and logical, but one thing that bothered me was your example of the "2005" census. The last census was in 2000, and censuses are every 10 years. Other thatn that great job, and you have earned my vote.

Report Offensive Comment
Elephant3

I apologize, you are absolutely correct. My population statistics were from the 2000 census. On www.infoplease.com the heading for population demographics is "Population of the United States by Race and Hispanic/Latino Origin, Census 2000 and July 1, 2005", I read it wrong.

Report Offensive Comment

Post A Comment

Please keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


or cancel

TIME PHOTO ESSAYS

Guns N' Roses

Only Axl Rose remains in the group, but since 1987 GnR has been rocking with fury


JFK: TIME's Best Cover Stories

More than 50 years of cover stories about the 35th President