Mark won the Face Off.
Colbert
Face Offs: 50
Wins: 27
Losses: 22
Ties: 1
No City, XX
All Face Offs
5
Votes
Peace
Face Offs: 33
Wins: 24
Losses: 8
Ties: 1
New Bedford, MA
All Face Offs
10
Votes

Die, Gore, die!


Global warming? No problemo!

Humans reduced atmospheric CO2 by 3 percent at the end of the Middle Ages -- by dying in great numbers.

1/3 of Europe's population died in the Black Plague and 50 million Native Americans were wiped out by European germs. The reduced population burned less wood and coal. Some wooded areas even grew back.

Those dirty Europeans (and Gore) can help save our planet -- by killing, killing, killing and dying, dying, dying.


are you saying the only way to save our planet would be to kill all humans? or just Europeans? if we killed just europeans everyone else will still be breathing fool!

and one person dying won't help end global warming.


Americans put out more CO2 per person than anyone else in the world, so it would be more efficient if Americans died to stop global warming. But the Europeans have a long history of dying in large numbers -- the Black Plague for example and a few "World" Wars.

Also these pesky Europeans seem to like to point out how important this global warming thing is! Like them Norwegians. After Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize, Bush started planning his invasion of Norway for having WMD - Weapons of Mass Distinction! Look at the dead in Iraq. and they say Bush doesn't have a plan for the problem of global warming! Fools!


you first stated that europeans were "dirty" and so was gore so we should kill them. but americans produce more CO2 than all of europe combined. I'm not advocating what your saying. Just pointing out how illogical your plan is. You just don't wanna the americans to be killed cuz you are one. and you have to consider the population. Most of the world lives in africa, and asia. So how is it logical to kill all the smallest of populations?

(again not advocating ur idea, just trying to debate something!)


"Those dirty Europeans" were carriers of disease resulting in the Black Plague and epidemics that killed a lot of Indians. I'm not advocating killing anybody, merely stating a fact -- those dirty Europeans (and Gore) CAN help save our planet -- by killing, killing, killing and dying, dying, dying. So could the genocidal Sudanese, the obese and oil imperialistic Americans, and Mexicans attacking emo kids.

In his comments, drea gets the point. "Over-population is really a problem that we need to address along with changing our light bulbs. We don't necessarily need people to die insomuch as we need them to stop being born"

Its either that or a Swiftian solution like the eating of Irish infants.


so your saying we should commit mass-genocide or mass-suicide based on that fact that someone is sudanese, european, Al Gore, obese americans, and oil imperialistic Americans and Mexicans. That is exactly the kind of ideology Hitler had for "the Solution" to the "jewish Problem". Eliminating people based on their nationality, size, name and riches is wrong. by the way Global warming isnt going to lead to the end of humanity. These steps arent needed. If we overpopulate maybe we should go spend more money of nasa and move quicker to advance onto other planets.

Comments

Add Your Comment
Brown

Wow, Hadrian, you can speak German!

Report Offensive Comment
Clinton-button

I see only ONE minor problem with the orginal argument. The writer is lacking a brain. Gore is trying to help the environment, I don't understand how anyone could look at him as a monster. Global Warming is killing our earth. By making the world warmer, our bears wake up earlier from hibernation (therefore throwing off the food chain), certain flowers that only bloom once a year bloom before their time, and much much more. Gore's proposals and attempts to correct this problem will save the world for the next generations. History will look upon him as a hero, and people like you as idiots, for not understanding his motives. On your behalf I hope your original argument was a joke Hadrian.

Report Offensive Comment
Romney

How could anyone look at gora as a monster? Good question but here's an even better one. How could anyone look at Cliton as a monster?

Report Offensive Comment
Romney

I think what Hardian is trying to convey is that famine and disease serve a purpose.

Report Offensive Comment
Capitol

Warmer weather is a good thing, especially since most of it is occuring in northern regions where agriculture used to be out of the question. Canada should thank us and algor should stop twisting the facts on global warming. The polar bears will have to cope.

Report Offensive Comment
Elephant3

Wait, maybe I missed something.... Who called Gore a monster? As far as I can tell, Ecyoj21 was the first to do so. PS - good to see you're getting into things, Joyce

Report Offensive Comment
Paul

Al Gore?!?! What a freaking joke. If he's so dead set that global warming equates to armageddon, then why does the guy live in an 11,000 square foot house that consumes 20x the elecricity of the average American? Then he leaves his energy devouring home and hops on private jets to speak around the world. I guess he found out there's more money in "global warming" than in politics.

Report Offensive Comment
Peace

Over population it really a problem that we need to address along with changing our light bulbs. We don't necessarliy need people to die insomuch as we need them to stop being born

Report Offensive Comment
Brown

Shawn, would this be the same Gore whose home was praised by the US Green Building Council, who awarded the home it's second highest rating for sustainable design, the same Gore who buys electricity from green power renewable initiatives and the same Gore who held the first congressional hearings on global warming back in the 70s? Yeah I'm sure this guy who has ben warning about the potential consequences of global warming for thirty odd years has been doing so in order to get money.

Report Offensive Comment
Paul

Tickers, you just have an answer for everything. The point is we are supposed to turn down our thermostats while he isn't? He's the one with the vast knowledge and insight on "global warming" Check the link out. http://www.tennesseepolicy.org/main/article.php?article_id=367

Report Offensive Comment
Clinton-button

Kenneth!

Report Offensive Comment
Brown

Hi Shawn, well I get bored at work and have a lot of time to look for answers. You've given a link from February 2007, and when I last checked it was April 2008, so it would perhaps be beneficial to see if there's anything more recent and relevant. Happily there is! (Joy!) Gore appears to have invested a lot into his home to make it far more energy efficient. His summer 2007 electricity consumption fell by 11% compared to 2006, while other homes in the Nashville area rose by 20-30% during a record heat wave. To insinuate that the man is basically using global warming as a means of making money or isn't practising what he is preaching is simply a falsehood. By the way would it be correct to guess that you aren't a big believer in global warming?(http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/13/gore.home.ap/)

Report Offensive Comment
Elephant

I am definately not a believe in global warming. Do I believe that global warming exists? Yes. Do I believe humans have an impact? Yes. Is that impact anything significant? No. Can Humans change the course of global warming? No. Therefore, do I believe people like Gore and the rest of the people who yeal up and down about global warming are wasting their time and mine by doing so? Most definately!

Report Offensive Comment
Paul

And Tickers if Gore, who held the first congressional hearings on global warming back in the 70s, believed what he was preaching, why did it take him until 2007 to start leading by example? Why did he only recently trade in his 9 MPG Ford Expedition in for a hybrid? Very good questions I suppose. But here's another link for you to take a look at. I thought it was interesting. http://www.practicalenvironmentalist.com/energy-efficiency/perhaps-al-gore-should-ask-george-w-bush-for-help-in-making-his-house-more-energy-efficient.htm

Report Offensive Comment
Brown

I would concur, they are good questions, untill you stop and think about them. The key of climate change is the 'carbon footprint' of a person, family or alien from mars. The home lifestyle is obviously a part of that, and perhaps a significant part, but to analyse that solely is effectively meaningless. For example you have to consider how the electricity is generated - at the time of both your articles Gore was paying $432/month to source as much as possible from renewable sources. If your energy is generated by solar power then it's pretty irrelevant how much you use (at least from a carbon perspective). The comparative ages of Gore's and Bush's homes make it somewhat unfair to directly contrast them. Gore's home was built in the 1920s, Bush's ranch in 1999 - it's far more costly and complicated to modify an existing build. Builds in the future should be more like Bush's ranch than Gore's mansion, but it is economically unfeasable to actually modify every house in America, much in the same way that a lot of people don't bother to upgrade their windows to double glazing. As for your car comment - the most recent thing I can find is him trading a lexus (hybrid) to a mercury mariner hybrid in March 2007, and from his own comments in 2006 where he says he 'bought a hybrid about a year ago', though in the same comment he also says that he doesn't drive much. So as far as I can work out he has had hybrid cars for a while. (Another comment to follow to prevent wall of text)

Report Offensive Comment
Brown

The issue I have with what you've been asserting, Shawn, is that you've been attacking Gore based on an idea that he is in some way hypocritical or in it for the money. That assertion simply doesn't stand up, since the limited evidence that can be provided for it is very selective. You may believe Al Gore is wrong, and I'll be honest personally I find carbon offset credits a somewhat bizarre concept, but that's a different debate. Gore talks about Global warming, and he lives according to what he's been saying.

Report Offensive Comment
Elephant3

Some interesting points: A) "Snow cover over North America and much of Siberia, Mongolia and China is greater than at any time since 1966." (1); B) "The U.S. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) reported that many American cities and towns suffered record cold temperatures in January and early February. According to the NCDC, the average temperature in January 'was -0.3 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average.'" (1); C) Saudi Arabia has been getting snow over the past few years, with "near-record low temperatures" and "National media sa[ying] the winter is the coldest in the country for 20 years." (2); D) The temperature of the Atlantic Ocean is actually far below its temperature just after the turn of the first millennium AD, even farther below its ancient temperatures, and remains below the 3000 year average temperature. (3); Sources: 1 - http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=332289 2 - http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/01/13/rare-snows-cold-saudi-arabia-ignored-us-media 3 - http://www.oism.org/pproject/Slides/img0.html

Report Offensive Comment
Brown

Hello RTBA2A. While they are interesting points it should be stated that they are simply points, that on their own do not actually prove anything - in the same way that a 'record heat wave' is not the conclusive evidence for global warming. When trying to measure the issue of climate change, one has to examine the climate as a whole, across the entire globe, in order to try to measure trends. On the snow issue, it's an intersting one, but I would like you to follow me on a train of thought for a moment in the following comment (to avoid wall of text syndrome)

Report Offensive Comment
Brown

Snow: How does it form? From moisture in the air freezing and falling to the ground. How does it get there? Water molecules evaporate from resevoirs of water, mostly the sea. What happens if you increase the temperature? You get an increase in evaporation and so more moisture in the air. What happens if there is more moisture in the air? You get more snow when it cools. It may be more valid to ask how long the snow hangs around for, but that would be viable only as a general trend. I'd like to say though that I do believe in human ingenuity - we as a species will move beyond fossil fuels either because of the attitude toward global warming or because those fuels simply run out.

Report Offensive Comment
Romney

Gore owns a telivison station, Current TV. He is going to profit 50 million off of the IPO. Half of the money raised by the IPO is going to him. Traditionally, the money raised by the IPO goes towards the comapny, not the founder.

Report Offensive Comment

Post A Comment

Please keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


or cancel

TIME PHOTO ESSAYS

TIME cover JFK

More than 50 years of cover stories about the 35th President


The Brazen Pirates of Somalia

This year, close to 90 ships have been seized in and around the Gulf of Aden, more than triple the number of 2007

(Jason R. Zalasky / US Navy / EPA )