CRISP said 04/18, 04:21 PM
I sometimes wonder as to the reasons our white brothers and sisters do things. I was in South Africa sometime last year. This journalist dude I was with (white of coz) offered to take me to Soweto. OK, I agreed. he said he like it there and believed that all Whites have to experiance the life in Soweto.
He obviously speaks as someone who goes there as a tourist and dont have to spend the nite there. He was clearly looking around his sholder every second fearing that some local criminal will attack us, I must say, I also felt a bit of a chill but hey, I am not a local, I just was following a supposedly knowledgeable local dude about the area.
There are informal settlements all over Soweto and a lot of people are jobless and poor. South African whites dont often go to the townships unless they are taking a foreign visitor for a tour. He gave a few coins to a woman who was actually selling fruit on the street as his way of showing compassion. For Christ sake, the woman was selling something making money for her self. She did not need the hand out from a guilty white boy.
I think that a lot of Whites just dont know what to do to show their disapproval of the past.
DonkeyDude said 04/18, 05:34 PM
It is hard to discern a debatable point from this... statement, but I take it to be that white people's displays of compassion or altruism are to be taken as condescending hand-outs aimed at purchasing relief from guilt.
I have two responses to this:
1) Why can't the white guy in this story just be a nice person who wanted to help the fruit vendor. What if she happened to be white too? Would you then paint this as Wealth Guilt? Would you say the same thing about the ACLU, or the Big Brothers program, or Mother Theresa ("Non Leper Guilt")? And how about the fact that the woman probably appreciated the extra coins? Did she return them?
2) So what if it IS an attempt to purchase a sense that you are doing something to combat past collective discrimination? Why is that a bad thing? What is your point?
CRISP said 04/19, 05:59 AM
The issue I'm raising here is that White dudes, especially of this generation do not know what to do when they are faced with the damage caused by the slave trade, apartheid and economic exploitation of the past. He does not need to do anything about it because like the body, when the world is wounded, the world heals itself.
The woman (black) took the money becaused its easy money. But Africans are said to be very proud people and would rather work hard for their accomplishments and not be patronised. I agree with philosophy and the white guy just didn't get it.
I also think that his deed, though meant to be kind, its selft fulfilling. It makes him feel good.
I also know a lot of people who contribute towards the healing fo the world. They are involved in initiatives that are long term solutions. They do community building work, skills development and they do it as a calling not because they feel they carry the responsibility to correct their great great grandparents did.
My point Dude is that Whites need to stop insulting people by their sorry gestures. Its OK to do something about human suffering,but it must come from the heart and be long term solution
DonkeyDude said 04/19, 08:47 PM
1) Touchy-feely pothead crap like "like the body, when the world is wounded, the world heals itself" has no place in a debate.
2) If the black woman took the "easy money," how does that reconcile with your statement that Africans are so proud and don't want to be patronized? If she didn't want the money, out of pride or any other reason, she wouldn't/shouldn't have taken it.
3) You can argue that ALL acts of altruism/philanthropy are aimed at purchasing a sense of self-fulfilling pride. Why is this any different than if I give a white bum a dollar on the street? Please don't bother responding unless you answer that question. You say that other ppl you know do community work "as a calling," but you do not allow for the fact that these ppl also get a sense of self-fulfillment from their actions. Every altruistic act brings a personal reward; what is wrong with that? (I.e., again, what is your point?)
4) Who are you to say whites may "do something about human suffering, but it must come from the heart," and call this guy's gift a "sorry gesture?" Why can't this have come from the heart?
I suspect that your own sense of white guilt is making you over-scrutinize this man's actions.
CRISP said 04/20, 11:25 AM
Come down Dude. Lets stick to facts of the debate and not get carried away. You ask again as to what is my point. Let me quote from my previous submission, "The issue I'm raising here is that White dudes, especially of this generation do not know what to do when they are faced with the damage caused by the slave trade, apartheid and economic exploitation of the past". That is my point.
I will not respond to your point 1 as my response will not change the engraved conclusion in your mind.
2. When I talk about proud Black people, I am refering to a society, a race, across the world. So if you minimise this issue to a case study you are mising the point. A lot of poeple around the world who are faced with sickness and death take the sorry gestures of the guilty not because they have lost the sense of their pride but because the gestrure solves (in the short term) their problems.
3/4. You are being hypethetical about the selffulfilling issue. You dont know if his deed did not make him feel good. I have better reason to believe he did because I was there in person.
About your closing statement: you assume I'm White. thats like shooting in the darkness.
DonkeyDude said 04/20, 02:41 PM
It's hard to address your "points" because they are nonsensical.
The crux of your argument is that "white dudes" don't know what to do about racial injustice (which you followed with your "world heals itself" nonsense). OK. If this is your thesis, I suppose you lost this debate for failing to provide any evidence whatsoever...
... except for the story about the white guy in Africa. But then, when I address that guy, you criticize me for reducing your patronizing comments about "proud Black people" to the "case study" that you spent 95% of your first argument putting forth.
Then you tell me I'm being "hy[o]thetical" by responding directly to the issue of self-fulfillment you raised. If you are going to attack the white guy's donative act as self-fulfilling, you must be willing to acknowledge that EVERY act of altruism confers some benefit to the person doing good. You could have chosen to disagree, but you don't even address my point (on ridiculous grounds).
As for assuming you're white.. If you weren't, I suspect you'd have said. I assumed that because you said "our white brothers and sisters" and your guide took you to Soweto because "all Whites have to experi[e]nce [it]." ???
I'm not real clear on what exactly is being debated either, Byah. But I think I've gotta vote for Donkeydude because Peace&love hasn't really proven anything here.
God's Son | 04/20/08
Report Offensive CommentGod's Son, I think PEACE&LOVE is trying to say that white people are privileged and it makes them uncomfortable. I agree because I have known many white people to do or say good things to blacks as a way to make themselves feel better. But yes, DonkeyDude did a better job in this debate, because he pointed out so many problems in PEACE&LOVE's statements and showed that PEACE&LOVE did not really give evidence of what he was trying to say. He just kind of said a general statement, which can not win in a debate.
Mike Hernandez | 04/20/08
Report Offensive CommentWTF are we talking about here? "White Guilt??" Gimme a break. Anyone who is the majority and is in power, who does something nice to someone of another group, can be said to be condescending. But that's bullsh*t. So white guys can't be nice to black guys basically, because since slavery occurred at one point, it means that white guys being nice is condescending.
majestik | 04/20/08
Report Offensive CommentPlease keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.
This year, close to 90 ships have been seized in and around the Gulf of Aden, more than triple the number of 2007
(Jason R. Zalasky / US Navy / EPA )
If I understand PEACE&Love correctly, (not sure i do) then i will agree with her. White people of the modern generation, i.e. born after ~1970 express a condecending attitude towards all minorities because they have, throughout history, been the race of priveledge. There is no reason to be embarrased or feel guilty because of your race, this is a step in the wrong direction in race relations.
Byah | 04/19/08
Report Offensive Comment