weareallequal said 04/23, 06:08 PM
That is my argument, what is your basis on people rigging debates? You losing? People doing good? People have the power to do well. Yet you act like a paranoid little boy.
majestik said 04/23, 07:27 PM
suck it, weareallequal. nobody cares what you say.
weareallequal said 04/23, 08:39 PM
how do you rig a debate? this isn't like a video game where you have cheat codes
majestik said 04/23, 10:49 PM
I thought I told you to suck it.
"suck it, weareallequal. nobody cares what you say." Best... argument.. ever.
Stew | 04/23/08
Report Offensive CommentPit Bull - Isn't it weird that Weareallequal is posting this debate topic when Peace&Love is the one accused of cheating? I guess it's just more evidence to the theory that they are the same person...
sallyjames | 04/23/08
Report Offensive CommentSorry. I just hate me some PEACE&LOVE. I mean weareallequal.
majestik | 04/23/08
Report Offensive CommentSally, not when you look at the examples DonkeyDude pointed out in one of the other debates on this issue, which showed those three characters responding directly to comments intended for the others. Sarcasm noted, Sally. But look at all the evidence before thinking I'm just sour grapes. Thanks.
USA Pit Bull 63 | 04/23/08
Report Offensive CommentLet's see. no limits to the number of avatars per person, possible voter blocs, possible voter recruitment, the ways are endless. thankfully i can tell that the coherent people have particular personalities (and i generally think if someone considers themself to be decent, they don't cheat).
MorgMcA | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentPitbull and others, it would not really surprise me. I am currently in a debate where I got 5 votes against me before making an oppening argument. The first comment was from P&L who openly supported the other debator. To be fair to the other debator, he/she seems genuine and way too articulated to be related to P&L. Still, 5 votes I can't explain: How can one cast a vote without reading both side? BTW MorgMcA, my response is posted.
Donkey DooZoo | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentYou mean against Tex Dem? To be fair, you punted the first argument and didn't really even debate in the second argument. I voted for Tex Dem on that basis - although I note that I am able to change my vote if your third arg persuades me.
DonkeyDude | 04/24/08
Report Offensive Commenthahahaha.. btw, is anyone actually reading the debate up above? it's hilarious that majestik is killing weareequal. Stew, your comment cracked me up.
DonkeyDude | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentYep I know I was grumpy yesterday. Wife nagged me badly.
Donkey DooZoo | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentDonkeyDooZoo, to think I thought you were decent. I think you have just stooped very low. Sorry you've just lost my attention... permanently.
CRISP | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentTO EVERYONE, I have come across poor debates on this site and saw worst of debaters win. I have been part of some tough debates against some smart people and lost graciously. I also have lost to some craziest members and never threw my toys. I am not proud of winning the debate against PitBull on the right to vote more than once. The reason I say that is because I know that my argument was killed by MorgMcA's suggestion that I should just switch my vote from one debater to the other. So I conceded and respectfully handed the trophy to him. Who voted for me? honestly, I dont care to know, but maybe those people didn't find PittBull and his argument apealing. So I have to take the flack for that... OK. To all those who believe I have cheated, I dont wish I knew how to. I'm not even a computer guru, nor am I a person with no self respect. I continue to debate in good spirit and I win some and loose some. Thats the nature of debates. I'm not going to argue with anyone that I'm the best debater, but I'm not a cheat and I will guard jelously for my integrity. Those who think they have a God given right to win against me, the will be surprised. I will do my best to get my views across in debates that I find within my scope. To those who are persuaded by my arguments, please continue to vote for me. In that way I will keep surprising bad loosers like Majestik and PittBull. (I'm not attacking you two, I just think over the two debates you were just bad loosers, but generally I thought you are good people). I will stay on this site and continue debating issues.
CRISP | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentUSA PIT BULL! It was not sarcasm. Sorry that you thought so - i have been following the P&L = weareallequal fiasco. It has been keeping me laughing and laughing and laughing.
sallyjames | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentI think that is evidence to the theory of the double /tripple idenity. It's P&L's war, so why does weareallequal care so much?
sallyjames | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentI did look at all the evidence and I am certainly with you, Ryan.
sallyjames | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentThanks for clarifying, Sally. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to do that. :)
USA Pit Bull 63 | 04/24/08
Report Offensive Commentp.s. Sorry I misread/-interpreted your comment from earlier.
USA Pit Bull 63 | 04/24/08
Report Offensive CommentPlease keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.
This year, close to 90 ships have been seized in and around the Gulf of Aden, more than triple the number of 2007
(Jason R. Zalasky / US Navy / EPA )
I believe it because it's happening. Pretty simple.
USA Pit Bull 63 | 04/23/08
Report Offensive Comment