alexon96 said 05/09, 06:06 PM
Everyone that says Hillary Clinton should drop out is not letting the voters decided in the remaining contests. Why can't Clinton stay in the race? Huckabee stayed in the race until there was a nominee even though he was far behind. No one told him anything. Clinton is not that far behind and she still has a chance. Its not like in every democratic convention only 1 candidate was left.
theyoungdem said 05/10, 10:12 AM
It???s true that if Hillary Clinton drops out now then the remaining voters would not be able to vote. However, it was shown that even if Hillary won 65% of all her remaining contests (which is highly unlikely since she couldn???t even do that in her highly favored states) then she???d still be behind Obama, and this includes 65% of superdelegates.
Huckabee was in the race far back in a time when it was safe to have two nominees without the threat of a divided party, especially since McCain was much more popular. Also you say no one told him anything? A lot of people told him to just drop out since there was no point.
You say she still has a chance???If you say there is a way she can win more than 65% in all her remaining contests and superdelegates, you are highly mistaken. Let???s see the states she was most favored in shall we?
Pennsylvania she won by 55%
New York she won by 57%
California she won by 52%
Ohio she won by 65%
You still think she has a chance when she couldn't even get 65% in her favored states?
Also you are incorrect when you say everyone who thinks Clinton should drop out is wrong. They have alot of reasons (see below in comments)
alexon96 said 05/10, 10:52 AM
We all know that she has a very low chance of getting the nomination. But she should still be allowed to go to the convention without anyone telling her to drop out. You never commented on what i said before. I said that its not like there hasn't been a convention with 2 democrats there. If you say that Obama is more likely to be the nominee, then why can't Clinton stay. If she's going to lose, its not going to make a difference with who the nominee is if Obama is closer to getting it. If Obama wants to get Clinton's supporters in the general election, then he has to get Clinton's supporters. What I mean is that, if Clinton drops out her supporters (most of them) would not support Obama. Obama has to beat Clinton and that will get him their support. He will not get Clinton's supporters if she just drops out and gives the nomination to Clinton. (This has nothing to do with the debate: those last sentences were confusing)
theyoungdem said 05/10, 03:18 PM
It's not a low chance...its a no chance. She could go to the convention, but she has to think of her party. What's the point of still going at it, while further dividing her own party? And you are right there has never "been a convention with 2 democrats there", there are hundreds.
Though I think you mean candidates. Normally one of the candidate already has the nomination, they reach the magic number. This time however, in this historic race, we have two candidates who have not yet gotten the nomination yet, very different.
Sen. George McGovern, former Democratic presidential candidate and US senator from South Dakota,was a major Clinton supporter. Now however he states: ???She has run a valiant campaign. Hillary, of course, will make the decision as to if and when she ends her campaign. But I hope that she reaches that decision soon so that we can concentrate on a unified party capable of winning the White House next November.???
So you are implying that the more Clinton reaches out and strengthens her supporters to back her, the easier it will be for Obama in the General Election to get those voters? That makes sense?
If she has no chance of winning, then why hurt Obama
alexon96 said 05/10, 05:10 PM
About Clinton's supporters: If Barack Obama wants to get Clinton's supporters, he has to WIN the nomination and not get it by Clinton withdrawing from the race. He will get the supporters if he wins the nomination while Clinton is still in the race. Clinton is not destroying the party. Just because the other voters that still didn't vote, go for her, doesn't mean that she is destroying the Democratic Party. She is not doing anything to destroy the party. She still has a slight chance and she wants to try to get it. Just because the race is going on for a long time doesn't mean anything. The other states still didn't vote and most of the voters in those states support Clinton.
PEOPLE ARE STILL VOTING FOR HER. WHY SHOULD SHE DROP OUT THEN? If your saying that she should drop out because she has no chance, then why can't she still stay in the race? The voters are going to decide.
theyoungdem said 05/11, 05:17 PM
Tell me why then,her staying in the race till the end would then make Obama get the votes of Clinton supporters, when the percentage of Clinton supporters, who would support Obama in the general election, decreasing?
I never said she is "destroying the Democratic Party." Though she is dividing the people in it. Her slight chance is no chance, other than West Virginia, there are no states that widely support her. She even lost her only advantage, the lead in superdelegates, Obama is ahead in that now as well. You say most of those voters in those states support Clinton?
In Oregon the majority of the polls show Obama ahead. In Puerto Rico, He is ahead in many polls, especially thanks to the endorsement of the governor of Puerto Rico to Obama. Your logic is flawed when you say she is ahead in most of the states, when she is only clearly ahead in Kentucky and West Virginia.
People are still voting, that was a superb statement pointing out the obvious, well done, that capitilization made it more truthful. I did not say she should drop out just because she has no chance, if you believe that is so, I suggest you read what I said again. Almost every major politician knows its done
All of this can be found at: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/candidates/#1746
theyoungdem | 05/10/08
Report Offensive CommentThe reasons for people believing she should drop out are not out of pure stupidity that you would label them as "wrong." The people who say she should drop out either wants to protect their party from furthur division or they know that she has no way of winning, or both. They are not "wrong".
theyoungdem | 05/10/08
Report Offensive CommentPLEASE SUPPORT ME IN MY DEBATE AGAINST CHESTYPULLER! HE IS ACCUSING ME OF CHEATING BECAUSE HE IS A SORE LOOSER! HELP ME MAKE THIS RIGHT!!!
gopdiva | 05/10/08
Report Offensive Commenthow did you lose your votes theyoungdem? How can you that?
alexon96 | 05/10/08
Report Offensive CommentOh yeah youngdem, you forgot Arkansas in the state she was most favored.
alexon96 | 05/10/08
Report Offensive CommentI apologize, there is ONE state where she meets the standards of geting above 65%, however, the Clintons have been known there for decades, Bill was the governor there for a while, she does not have the same advantage in the upcoming states. Also You can I do that? I don't know what you mean, but I went from like four votes to one.
theyoungdem | 05/10/08
Report Offensive Commentyeah i was talking about the votes. Clinton is more popular in the upcoming states: West Virginia Kentucky Puerto Rico Oregon (not that far behind) the other states i dont know about
alexon96 | 05/10/08
Report Offensive CommentObama is not ahead in Puerto Rico. More than 98% for the people that live there are hispanics. They widely support Clinton.
alexon96 | 05/11/08
Report Offensive CommentI was saying that more Clinton supporters would go to Obama if he wins the nomination. If Clinton just drops out, her supporters will not think that Obama really one the nomination.
alexon96 | 05/11/08
Report Offensive CommentYou're basing your statement that Clinton is ahead in Puerto Rico just because they are hispanic there? That's absurd. There's a difference between hispanics in the states and hispanics in Puerto Rico, Obama has shown to win in places outside the 50 states
theyoungdem | 05/11/08
Report Offensive CommentObama will not win Puerto Rico because it is mostly hispanic?! Well that's more than a little absurd. If Clinton drops out, her supporters will vote for Obama because he is a Democrat and they all hate the Republicans. Well, maybe not hate... but they don't want them in power any more. All she is doing is diving her party even more and allowing McCain to emerge as the "golden boy".
KittyCatRep | 05/12/08
Report Offensive CommentI agree, with kittycat. As the two democrats keep going at it and keep having these scandals and controversies, MCcain appers to be the mature reliable golden boy.
yngster | 05/12/08
Report Offensive CommentI think that the only reason this race is so close is because of project chaos. Obama would have won Indiana if it wasn't for project chaos.
yngster | 05/12/08
Report Offensive CommentThe margin won by Clinton was so narrow, if project chaos did not exist, he most definitley would have won Indiana. However, it's true that McCain is greatly benefitting from this on going battle between Obama and Clinton, yet another reason she should drop out, especially due to the fact that she has no chance.
theyoungdem | 05/12/08
Report Offensive CommentPlease keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.
Armed militant groups push into Pakistan's Northwest Frontier Province and its principal city, Peshawar, threatening the stability of a key transit point in the American effort to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan
(Mohammad Sajjad / AP)
The celebrated author and humorist was feted in photographs his entire career
(Bettmann / Corbis)
*correction from argument Ohio she won by 54%
theyoungdem | 05/10/08
Report Offensive Comment