DonkeyDude won the Face Off.
Peace
Face Offs: 5
Wins: 2
Losses: 3
Ties: 0
No City, XX
All Face Offs
4
Votes
Donkey
Face Offs: 30
Wins: 22
Losses: 6
Ties: 2
Los Angeles, CA
All Face Offs
9
Votes

THE REASON HILLARY IS STILL RUNNING IS...


Hillary is not stupid. She knows she stands no chance at this point, but she won't cut her losses. The reason she has not bowed out is because she knows that there is more for her in staying than if she quits.

* she is hoping that Obama is going to cause a big fu*k up and she will be there to take over.

* She has a huge debt, which she cannot pay when she is outside the race. The longer she stays in it, the more she can fundraise to pay back that debt.

* She believes that if she stays in the race until the end, she will have performed much better than the previous losers who fell early (this includes the previous presidential elections 2000 and 2004). So she can claim to be the toughest and the only future option should Obama fail to beat McCain.

* She is testing her popularity for future positions like the leader of party or Governorship.

need I say more??


1) You are correct that, in Hillary's mind, there is a chance that some scandal will befall Obama and she will be there to pick up the torch and run with it. But the odds of this happening are slim and, more importantly, the DNC will nominate Obama regardless - both for his fund-raising ability and because of the uproar it would cause to ignore his delegate win.

2) Most of her debt is to herself. She does not need to "pay back that debt," and she and her husband are perfectly capable of settling all of the campaign's debts tomorrow if she drops out today.

3) If Obama loses to McCain, a lot of fingers will be pointed straight at her. Her insatiable thirst for the presidency (and the tactics she's resorted to in pursuit thereof) has indisputably divided the party. Her extremely high negative rating is only going up each day, and being pegged a "sore loser" won't help her in '12.

4) Polls can test popularity just fine, and she doesn't suffer from lack of name recognition. Staying in this race is hurting her popularity and making her even more polarizing of a figure. She doesn't want to return to the Senate, and it's unlikely that she'd see a gov'ship as a great consolation prize.


I struggled to see where exactly do you differ with me, but let me continue with my point anyway.

The other reason Hillary is still in this race is because she committed to ensure that everyone gets the chance to vote. If she continues with her campaign, she then appears as a woman of her word.

She also will say the reason she did not quit is because she wanted even the people from "small towns, who are accused of clinging to guns and religion" have their say.

I don't see how anyone would blame her for Obama's loss. The negative campaigning is over, Obama has time to recuperate from that. If he loses, its his fault.

Hillary is enjoying sympathy from voters at this point. All those who feel that she has been unfairly treated, either because she is a Clinton or because she is a woman are feeling sorry for her. That cannot affect her popularity, it only enhances their respect for her tenacity.

I believe Hillary and Huckabee were just setting the stage for the next election, hence their late exits.


Let's see. I disagreed with you point by point (with the half-exception of your first point), in numbered paragraph format. If you can't figure out how I disagree with you, I don't know how to help you out.

As to your last argument, let me be clear: I DISAGREE (again). "Committed to ensure that everyone gets the chance to vote?" Are you kidding me? She's committed to count as many votes in her favor as possible, but "disenfranchising" the MI/FL voters couldn't be farther from her mind. The MI/FL votes should not count, as per the rules she agreed to beforehand. Do you actually think this megalomaniac would give a rat's **** about those votes if those states went in Obama's favor? If so, you have not been paying attention to her campaign.

Re: blaming her for Obama's loss. Obama has not lost! All signs indicate that he has, at the least, a very good shot in Nov. Certainly a better shot than he had at being the nominee a few months ago... You remind me of a Nader fanatic here.

People do not "respect her tenacity" at this point. There is a fine line between tenacity and her unique blend of pride, vanity and entitlement. You know who's happiest she's still in this race? Rush Limbaugh


Donkey Dude, This is a simple debate. You sound like a Clinton hater. In the history of American politics there has never been a formidable woman candidate that has run such a powerful campaign. She has made history however you look at it.

I think that she is a tenacious woman and she has earned a lot of respect from a lot of people, as well as rebuke from those who believe Obama should be the nominee.

In summary: Hillary has a legacy to protect, leave her future chances open and raise more money to settle her debt, and hoping for a miracle. Those are the reasons she will not quit.


I never claimed this to be anything other than a simple debate, 4Gore. And I do hate Clinton. That ad hominem attack aside, you have done absolutely nothing to counter my points.

Hillary is not protecting her legacy. If anything, her and Bill's negative campaign tactics have only tarnished the Clinton name (especially among blacks and younger voters).

Nor is she attempting to raise more money to pay back debts, as her campaign loses money every day of its operation.

The reason she remains in this race is simple: She had to proclaim that she would take this thing to the finish line, so as not to dissuade her supporters from voting in this tight race. Now that it's essentially pointless, her pride won't let her land the plane.

Because you didn't even attempt to counter my points (which themselves undercut your unsupported points), you haven't carried your burden here.

Comments

Add Your Comment
Obama

Amen Donkeydude

Report Offensive Comment
Coulter

If I were Hillary I'd take the VP job and one year down the line, kill Obama. That way, I become President and can live my dream. (JUST JOKING!!!) DD, which one is better for Hillary to settle her debt using her own money, or to get donations from through her campaign, I think any write minded person would save as much of her personal funds and tap into donated funds. So I'm with 4Gore for now, but I'll hold on to my vote until debates are stronger.

Report Offensive Comment
Donkey

LOL. Scary, but funny. Someone here said that if Obama makes her his Veep, he'd better hire a food tester. I know I would. I agree that it is better to pay off debts with OPM (other people's money), but keep in mind that there is a reason she is so in the hole: Her campaign is running in the red! She's not sitting there just racking up cash; she's spending more than she is taking in - so I guess math just isn't her friend this year.

Report Offensive Comment
Hat

absolutely right DonkeyDude, about Hillary being blamed if Obama does fail to win.

Report Offensive Comment
Whitehouse

Hillary won't take the VP slot. The reality is that she IS the senior stateswoman, and it's not her but Obama that has split the party. Obama won't win the general election (Hillary's arguments about the general election are correct) and that's about the only reason she's staying in the fight. BTW, see the interesting article from Bill Whalen on the National Review Online - if the Dems played by the Republican "winner takes all" delegates rules, Hillary would already be the nominee.

Report Offensive Comment
Coulter

Santa you're right.

Report Offensive Comment
Flagbutton

Forget playing by GOP rules. If the Dems played by their own rules, Terry McAuliffe and Hillary Clinton would stop trying to count the Michigan and Florida delegates, whom they had previously agreed to disregard.

Report Offensive Comment
Donkey

Exactly, PB. That's idiotic; I mean, if they played by the rules of the 19th Century, neither of them would be able to run. Who cares? That's also irrelevant. That really is one of the stupidest arguments I've heard on this site. They are playing by the rules as established and agreed to beforehand, and Obama won. Santa's other argument (that she is the elder stateswoman so it is he who is splitting the party) is indicative of Hillary's followers' mentality that the was entitled to the presidency. F*CK that! That's what most Americans don't like about her! And to all of you who say Obama can't win in Nov., I invite you to talk all the sh*t you want to me if he does lose the general (notwithstanding the indisputable fact that his chances would be better if she did not drag out the inevitable and do all McCain's dirty work for him). But if he wins, I expect to hear you all admit you were wrong - and probably racist for thinking this black man cannot win a general election against a white man even though polls indicate he will.

Report Offensive Comment
Coulter

Did anybody suggest Obama is going to lose because he is Black. I think you are changing your game plan there DonkeyDude. How about the fact that Hillary is a woman? About Obama being the presumptive nominee, you are stating the obvious. However, he may still lose in November, and FYI, the polls don't back your argument.

Report Offensive Comment
Donkey

The polls do support my argument, POST. He is essentially neck-and-neck with McCain, and has at times been far ahead of him. Notably, the ugly fight with Hillary has tarnished his image, and his numbers have waned a bit. However, America has a short memory for the type of politics of distraction that have affected Obama's image lately. Further, as the party unifies around him and HRC supporters come to their senses, polls will once again reflect that Obama is the favored candidate in the fall. Whether he is ahead or slightly behind in the polls, however, my point is that he statistically has a very, very strong chance of winning. More than 50%? Maybe or maybe not, depending on the poll, but very strong. For someone to say he "can't win" is to say he has a zero percent chance. The only thing that would make someone say that (as opposed to, say, Hillary or Edwards) is because he is black, and people largely think this country is not ready to elect a black president. And no, Hillary's being a woman is not even close to the same thing. More than 50% of the voters have been women. Women were not lynched, enslaved, forced to drink from separate fountains (as recently as 40 years ago), etc, etc.

Report Offensive Comment
Donkey

BTW, POST, that argument was directed at what Santa said in the comments, not the debate above. That's why I posted it in the comments, just to be clear.

Report Offensive Comment
Flagbutton

DD, even I think you took that a little too far. Black men had the right to vote fifty years before white, black, or any color of American woman could. I will not accept any logic that suggests that if someone thinks Obama won't (or can't) beat McCain, it's the product of subversive (perhaps subliminal) racism. To me, it's that very psyche that seems the closest thing to actual racism. (Disclaimer: I'm not saying that you, in particular, are a racist.) Rapper 50-Cent publicly stated that he doesn't believe America is ready for a black president, and even went so far as to say, ''I think they [Americans] might kill him [Obama].'' I suppose he's racist against blacks and whites! To me, it's amusing watching leftists take their own medicine and suffer their own bag of silly political tricks. Clinton backers claim sexism; Obama fans claim racism; and the latest is Terry McAuliffe saying Clinton should win the popular vote, which might make the democrat nominee NOT a product of the popular vote. Would democrats blame each other for voter disenfranchisement? Voter fraud? Tough pill to swallow. :)

Report Offensive Comment
Donkey

PB: I agree with the spirit of what you're saying - and I am notably not a "leftist." I just cannot fathom why so many people declare that "Obama cannot win" in the general, when he is in fact a very strong candidate. You don't think he will win? Fine. But to say he CAN'T win? The only reason I can think of is that people do not expect a great deal of other Americans to vote for a black person. This mentality, I believe, is reflective of a silent form of racism that allows its proponents to avoid accountability: "I'm not saying I wouldn't vote for a black guy; I just don't think people will." I am an ardent Obama supporter, and I sincerely hope he is the next president. I don't see how my perspective seems racist. I'd actually love to be proven wrong; please provide me with a non-race-based reason that Obama CANNOT win.

Report Offensive Comment
Donkey

Surprised 4Gore hasn't 4feited this one. Oh wait, he's not up against his Deadpresidents account. DP(etc), finish your debate with me if you're so cavalier about your leaderboard position.

Report Offensive Comment
Peace

Sorry, My computer at home (from where I normally engage with this site)crushed. I had to finish this debate at the office. Ordinarily, I'd avoid using my work's internet for these debates. I don't know what you mean about me not being "up against his Deadpresident's accounts". Whatever you meant, I'm sure you don't require my response. I have finished the debate, ball on your court.

Report Offensive Comment
Coulter

DonkeyDude proposes that we don't vote before the 6 arguments have been heard. I support him and would like everyone to join us. This will make sure that people complete their debates and not avoid finishing their debates when they are trailing in votes.

Report Offensive Comment
Donkey

4Gore, I take it back. I thought you had forfeited multiple debates to the fraud DEADPRESIDENTS, but you haven't. I saw the same result twice. But I would like to know what made you forfeit that debate..

Report Offensive Comment

Post A Comment

Please keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


or cancel

TIME PHOTO ESSAYS

TIME cover JFK

More than 50 years of cover stories about the 35th President


The Brazen Pirates of Somalia

This year, close to 90 ships have been seized in and around the Gulf of Aden, more than triple the number of 2007

(Jason R. Zalasky / US Navy / EPA )